Today's topic for discussion is:
| Italics, bold, underline?, or |
| posted at: 03:25 | permanent link to this entry |
| Now I'm back home, it's time to look south for the next mini-road trip...The space shuttle is still on the pad while being repaired, so I'm looking at an Atlantic Coast trip. Hopefully, I'll find a room down there. |
| posted at: 03:24 | permanent link to this entry |
| [Edited for broken links...originally written Dec. 20...The week w/o internet was nice, IMO :-] It's mid-december, and the weather is balmy for mid-december; chai still feels great, though...Uptown Coffee is still my favorite workspace around here, and it's where I'm typing this update...The drive out from Atlanta was smooth, yet felt a _lot_ longer than 4:45'...Alabama DOT has extended U.S. 78 to "the first cut" north of I-20, the trip is another 10 minutes shorter than before...We got to play with cameras, both my point-n-shoot, and my friends SLR (both digital); we completely agree the feedback loop for digital is near-required for learning/remembering WTF we're doing. And on that note, some (very large!) pictures:
|
| posted at: 17:45 | permanent link to this entry |
Today's topic for discussion is:
| Rainy days are made for sleeping in. |
| posted at: 03:27 | permanent link to this entry |
First Look: American Roadhouse
| Today involved brunch at the place that's usually closed when I walk past, on my way to Osteria next door. My first impression was "Home Run." I loved it, and will return to try the blue plates in the near future. There is a spot waiting on the dining page for this place, I figure by March or April, I'll have enough information to work with. |
| posted at: 03:27 | permanent link to this entry |
Cloverfield, Godzilla, and 9/11
| [Originally posted 12/17/07]
ATLMalcontent has linked a third (that I'm aware of) Cloverfield trailer; and I'll use that cue to vent a bit. Regarding Cloverfield...The part of me that's used to disappointment wants this movie to be a "Godzilla-done-right" that would atone for Hollywood's nerfing of Godzilla '54 and the Great Sea Iguana Redub Project of '99 (which is not deserving of the G. name). This means rendering the amount of carnage and death which would result from Godzilla stomping flat a city of 8 million pedestrians--blood and body parts strewn everywhere, amidst charred corpses and rubble, and abject terror. Now that 9/11 has occurred, there's enough comparison between Godzilla ('54) and those events (and the wars that have followed) that a ground-level remake, or even a new movie using similar story--derived from a 21st century "evil" of choice--would put its monster in proper context for Americans. I'd expend my "one movie per year" quota on such a project, in a heartbeat. Godzilla vs. 9/11I worked out the 9/11 comparison while watching the original Godzilla on the 50th anniversary tour (2004), andA new movie, and perhaps a new monster, could represent the result of similar meddling with the Islamic world. If produced using current techniques and CG advancements, such a project would reintroduce the Monster Movie to a 21st century audience, and maybe even spur a review of the original. So, if Cloverfield is such a project, it will be a coup of sorts. Attack of the Meme?The trailers hint at something more insidious than just a monster, however. Some of the redshirts seem to be running from human-scale monsters that can chase them. So, perhaps there's a xenomorphic aspect to this monster, which would spread parasitic seeds to people, a la Alien. If so, the Cloverfield monster's offspring would embody the memes which are used to infiltrate, divide, and polarize our population for the past six years. In any event, parasitic/xenomorphic offspring add an extra dimension to the Monster Movie. A Godzilla that breeds Aliens? At least this one didn't lay as many eggs in Madison Square Garden as the Knicks have the past few years.Buy the rumor...Then, there's the part of me that recalls the saying "Buy the rumor, sell the fact." I see Godzilla and Alien aspects from the three trailers I've seen so far, the 'discovered tape' is straight out of Blair Witch Project, and the trailers employ Planet of the Apes' Liberty Head, along with 9/11's collapsing (Empire State?) building and ominous dust cloud. So far, I score -2 Landmarks, +1 body count (speared on Liberty's crown), and +1 Web 2.0 slam (everyone stop to take pictures) for the three trailers, for 3 or 4 cliche points. Combined with the "U.S. site #..." pretext, I assume we end up nuking (or otherwise disposing of) the city, and the intervening 1:45 is spent offing the assemblage of yuppies-turned-redshirts, in slasher-movie fashion. Lots of running, and yelling, and frequent scene cuts. This, by the way, is actually a better answer for filler plots; if you're not going to do something weighty like Godzilla's love triangle, don't bother.Then again, with so many aspects in play here, we may as well have a zombie invasion subplot, where victims turn into fast zombies and start eating people (and spreading zombie plague). This sounds silly , but if the movie exists to kill off the party, then it won't matter how many cliches are used, as long as the party is dead by the end of the movie. Cloverfield may as well be named Monster Movie, a serious version of Scary Movie. The production team is known for the television hits Lost and Heroes, which are both current shows (barring effects from the Writers' strike). Given that background, and the inrinsic incest of media conglomerates, I'll put a 50%+ chance of crossover/tie-in with one of the two shows (namely, whichever show is aligned with the studio's parent company). So, as tempting a prospect as Cloverfield is, I get a headache just thinking about how badly it will suck. I will, therefore, wait for reviews and spoilers before watching this movie. |
| posted at: 04:50 | permanent link to this entry |
Today's topic for discussion is:
| I've automated topic generation to a degree; they should now feed from an input file, whenever I update this blog. |
| posted at: 00:29 | permanent link to this entry |
| I stopped by The Local for dinner tonight; I had no idea it was a BBQ joint. Smoked meat, brunswick stew, hush puppies, good beer--this is my new favorite place. Except for the smoke-ridden interior, of course. Fortunately, the porch is more than suitable for outdoor suppers, so as long as the weather's warm enough, The Local will be a place to go.
And for a veggie fix, I've discovered Eats. Their menu is kind of like soul food, without the bacon. Tomorrow will involve American Roadhouse, which is usually closed by time I get into that part of the neighborhood. |
| posted at: 23:14 | permanent link to this entry |
| I went to the Thrashers game yesterday, and splurged for a seat on the glass. I now have a bruised thumb from beating on the glass, so the ticket was worth the price. :) |
| posted at: 21:47 | permanent link to this entry |
Today's topic for discussion is:
| Bell curves. |
| posted at: 10:44 | permanent link to this entry |
| On the way back into town, I took an idle look at the weather, and was shocked to see a forecast for four straight days of rain. Now that is one great Christmas present. |
| posted at: 17:31 | permanent link to this entry |
Today's topic for discussion is:
| Favorite cholesterol grenade: Chili dogs, Cheesesteaks, or fried-egg sandwiches? |
| posted at: 13:37 | permanent link to this entry |
The Art of Losing: Field Report
Here's one more to add to the pile. I was going to wait to add this in a third installment, but it's such a winner(loser) I had to describe the carnage in its own post:Game: 1/3 NL Holdem |
| posted at: 19:03 | permanent link to this entry |
Today's topic for discussion is:
| As it turns out, tomato soup turns into tomato cement after it boils over the pot and drips through the rangetop. I've had to resort to the "soak all day" approach to get the stuff out. |
| posted at: 04:23 | permanent link to this entry |
| I, in my cleverness, have dropped the links to archives from June-September. I'll get around to fixing this later. |
| posted at: 04:21 | permanent link to this entry |
Today's topic for discussion is:
| Lazy, Lazy Sunday. |
| posted at: 20:17 | permanent link to this entry |
| One thing I forgot to mention amidst the drought-related discussion...I haven't developed any film or prints in a year and a half. The process is highly water intensive, unless you've built a recycling/treatment setup (which I haven't). So, I've "gone digital" for the time-being. And since I actually have the battery and camera at the same time, I'll shoot some grainy pictures from the road. |
| posted at: 15:41 | permanent link to this entry |
| And just in case I was thinking my reflexes would improve, I completely shattered a pint glass, whose foot-slicing remnants lie between myself and my shoes. Fortunately, I at least have an old broom to work with. And now that I've swept up the pieces, I see I have destroyed one of the pint glasses from a Dunwoody Beer Festival of years past. Blah :P My final tasks before hitting the road: dry out the herbs, finish laundry, clean up any leftover dishes, and drop off next months' rent check. |
| posted at: 15:02 | permanent link to this entry |
Today's topic for discussion is:
| Freezing weather this weekend means faucets must drip. During a drought. I hope we at least get some decent rainfall out of this. |
| posted at: 00:30 | permanent link to this entry |
| Paul Mitchell's report is public. I'm still looking through the document; at first glance, it appears to be a telling of one social tree's involvement in the propagation of steroids...which means at least two more were active, and all hell will break loose throughout the winter and next season. That being said, there are a few non-surprises I see at first glance. [As I read the report, I'll strike and replace what needs correcting]:
|
| posted at: 18:04 | permanent link to this entry |
Today's topic for discussion is:
| There's something about spicy Asian cuisine that drives hangovers back into the abyss from whence they came. |
| posted at: 12:53 | permanent link to this entry |
| There's a great thread on Slashdot today, involving personal satisfaction with one's code. The whole thread is a good read, but this comment (among a few) is primo. |
| posted at: 19:43 | permanent link to this entry |
I have one more thing to add to my ever-increasing list of pre-vacation tasks: find new glass for my car.
For this window to be broken (vs. other windows), someone must have fumbled in some way. I'd parked with an empty space to each side, and was playing cards for a few hours, so I have no idea how this happened. It looks like the window was poked, based on the eventual bowing out of the glass (as someone retrieved the stick or item. In any event, GBMC. I'll have to get this fixed prior to leaving, and will probably have the front glass adjusted as well.Update: replacement cost: $600.00. $%$@#*! |
| posted at: 16:49 | permanent link to this entry |
Today's topic for discussion is:
| Velociraptor. |
| posted at: 14:34 | permanent link to this entry |
Today's topic for discussion is:
| Vanilla extract is a significant improvement for oatmeal. |
| posted at: 22:40 | permanent link to this entry |
| 2007 will be the fourth straight year with a Warner Robins team in the 4-A football title game: Warner Robins High School 2004 (and since moved to 5-A), Northside HS 2005-2007. |
| posted at: 22:39 | permanent link to this entry |
Hold'em results this season (Sundays Oct-Dec):
|
| posted at: 22:36 | permanent link to this entry |
Today's topic for discussion is:
| Centipedes. |
| posted at: 21:15 | permanent link to this entry |
Marketing vs. Advertising, and Google.
| [I left a smaller version of this post over on apophenia's article about the implications of ad-clicking (which, in turn, links to a good article whose necessity in 2007 is a bit saddening). Here's the longer and more disjoint version, links added. I'll build this into a more complete form, over the coming weeks.] I think there is a difference between marketing and advertising, and that difference is illustrated between Google and ads (even the ones on Google). But first, some personal bias (apologies for the long detour): I had a run-in with that .001x of the web base, about 10 years ago, and I find it highly amusing that the advertising people's efforts to pollute web pages end up with that demographic as their main "customers"... I was in Little Rock on business, and had stayed an extra day to see/hear a current President (Clinton, at this time) speak that morning. So, I slept late, and didn't make it downstairs in time to get to the speech. In the meantime, I stopped into the gift shop to pick up a paper, and found it full of...Beanie Moms. Recall, this was when those plushy toys were popular and were considered "collectibles" (early runs likely still are, etc). There must have been 20 of them, glaring at each other with hostility and suspicion. Between them and the merchandise of the gift shop, there was about 8 people worth of floorspace remaining. They honestly looked like dogs who knew they were about to fight over a steak. So, between bothering Secret Service agents with pointless questions, and harassing Beanie Moms, I chose the more dangerous route. As it turned out, the gift shop recieved a shipment of beanies each week on that day. The collected assembly of angry, big-haired women, who had obviously become quite accustomed to their world revolving around them, had signed up for a draft, the order of which would be selected at random. Since Beanie Babies followed some form of rarity schedule (like CCGs, etc.), this meant that draft order directly related to net gain, whether from resale or trade leverage. Each Beanie Mom was absolutely pissed off at every other Beanie Mom in the place, for having the nerve to show up for that week's draft. I ended up fishing a Beanie Baby from the wooden barrel of neglected, "common" beanies, located in the back corner of the store. The collected, palpable hatred of the room was then focused on me, as the cashier registered my purchase ahead of the two or three people remaining in line to sign up for the draft. I left, somewhat surprised that I walked out of the shop in one piece. I've also been stuck within earshot of a lunch meeting of "search advertisers", and found the sight both amusing and depressing. I consider Marketing to be ultimately concerned with delivering product/service from supplier to consumer (using both terms in the general sense). I consider Advertising as a means of establishing and maintaining demand from the consumer side, by "cultivating" mindshare. When Advertising people inflate their role to that of actual marketing, you find notions that ads have currency beyond mindshare; click-through as a performance metric is a shining example of this conceit. Consider the following, highly simplified, purchase pattern: Needs/wants --drive-> customer tendencies --to-> search/consider --then-> buy/lease/subscribe --and-> review their choice . While ads can be inserted anywhere in this chain, Advertising remains a subset of the needs/wants drivers. Period. Search engines live in the search/consider phase, and bank on the transitions between search and buy. Therefore, as a search engine, Google is Marketing. The ads that show up on search engines are riders. As applied to the Web: I consider the hyperlink (and downstream order management, etc.) as marketing, and content surrounding that link as advertising. As the linked article points out: ...since the audience has already been highly qualified by their search term and is .hand-raising. ... it is logical to focus on a click as a very good proxy for the generation of a qualified lead... Not the case ... where the audience is not in an active search- and-buy mode.As far as capitalization {advertisers preying on web users} goes: I find it difficult to believe that Web users are being taken advantage of, for choosing to navigate via hyperlinks (marketing) that have a picture/noise/animation/slogan (advertising). That behavior might be a sign of disadvantage of some kind, but I think advertiser-induced disadvantage would result in a growing percentage of users with that condition. |
| posted at: 22:45 | permanent link to this entry |
Today's topic for discussion is:
| Spice Girls, or Snorg Girls? |
| posted at: 16:38 | permanent link to this entry |
Today's topic for discussion new word is:
metastasi: n.
|
| posted at: 15:23 | permanent link to this entry |
Today's topic for discussion is:
| Spinach salad: it's healthy, especially the bacon and blue cheese bits. :-) |
| posted at: 22:05 | permanent link to this entry |
The Ghosts of Christmas Past and Present
| It's been two years since the last big road trip. It's also been almost a year since the great poker/gamble adventure I came to term The Art of Losing.
Yet again, I've saved up lots of vacation, and the lure of the highway and the prospect of going for another gamble calls me. So, I've been considering possible places to visit while I'm on the road, and I'm slightly torn between several themes. In one camp, I'd like to visit the places I missed the last time out...
This has all been in consideration lately. You'd think I'd just pack the car and go, but I have to sweat it out a bit, first. Oh, well. |
| posted at: 21:54 | permanent link to this entry |
